Monday, February 28, 2011

National Grammar Day

You're invited.  Who'da thunk it was time to celebrate?  March 4th is National Grammar Day.  Here's a little taste of what to expect.

March Forth: The Grammar Song

5 Easy Ways to Learn Grammar With The New York Times

grammar cartoonAlejandro Yegros
For our first guest post, we’ve invited the good people at Grammarlogues, a software- and Web-based tool “founded on the premise that grammar matters most when it has meaning beyond a set of memorized rules,” to write about ways to use The Times to bring grammar lessons to life. Come tell us how you make grammar come alive, below!

Grammar, Party of One
By Danielle Hoagland and Judith McCaffrey for Grammarlogues.com
National Grammar Day. Three words that might elicit an even greater sigh than the term grammar itself.
The holiday conjures up images of celebrants frantically grabbing red pens and running through towns and cities, adding, crossing out, and otherwise correcting abuses of syntax and diction. Innocent passersby and unsuspecting onlookers are interrogated: True or false: You cannot end a sentence with a preposition. Infinitives should never be split. Passive voice is always wrong.
Let’s reclaim this national holiday right here and now. Boycott the red pen that ensnares us in syntactical games of right and wrong, and pick up a piece of literature, any piece of literature, and explore the English language with fresh eyes.
Or just read The New York Times, which provides a panoply of grammar concepts that rivals any handbook. Consider the following five possibilities:

1. Variation Exploration

Reporters and editorial writers have one job in common: holding their readers’ interest. An essential tool for doing this is sentence variety, or using different sentence structures to avoid monotony.
The three-sentence paragraph below by Adam Liptak is a good example—he follows a simple sentence with a complex sentence, which he extends with two fairly hefty participial phrases, and he concludes the paragraph with a simple question:
“The proposed trial of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed in Manhattan presented perhaps the most extreme example of this conundrum. Had the trial proceeded there, a change of venue motion based on local news coverage and community outrage was almost inevitable, given Mr. Mohammed’s confession to planning the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. But would that intensity of feeling be any less anywhere else in the United States?”
— “Finding Untainted Jurors in the Age of the Internet”
Try this: Find one other example of sentence variety in a paragraph from an article in The Times that interests you. Analyze it as we did here to describe why it works. For more on complex sentences, click here.

2. Punctuation Station

The Times is a one-stop shop for punctuation, with virtually every mark used in every issue.
In the sentence below, for instance, Jonah Lehrer uses a semicolon to separate two independent clauses. Are alternate punctuation marks possible? What would happen, for instance, if a comma were used instead?
Darwin, of course, was wrong; his recurring fits didn’t prevent him from succeeding in science.
— “Want a Better Listener? Protect Those Ears”
There is no better model for the punctuation of dialogue than an article containing dialogue. The example below of an interrupted quote is a good demonstration:
“We need to look at noise as something that is dangerous,” Ms. Nadler said, “like sharp tools or a hot stove.”
— “Depression’s Upside”
Try this: Pick a type of punctuation mark, the semicolon for example, and scan an article to see where these are placed and how they are used. Then use one of those sentences as a model to try your own use of that mark. (And for more on semicolons, click here.)

3. Rule Breaker

You must understand the “rules” of grammar before you break them. If you read The Times regularly, you’ll see instances when writers intentionally break the “rules” to achieve a purpose. For example:
Is one of the sentences below a fragment? If so, what effect does it have on the article?
“Then came overtime. Pressure anyone?”
— “Crosby’s Goal Ends Thriller as Canada Beats U.S.”
Does the following sentence end in a preposition, and if so, is this the only way to express the idea? For the answer, click here.
“The Knicks (20-39) have lost 10 of their last 11 games and have 23 games left to muddle through.”
— “James Shows Knicks Just Why He Is Their Fondest Wish”
Why might a writer use a string of passive verbs in a particular sentence? In the following sentence, how do these passive constructions emphasize the topic?
“The roles of most of the 20,000 or so genes in the human genome are still poorly understood, but all can be assigned to broad categories of likely function depending on the physical structure of the protein they specify.”
— “Human Culture, an Evolutionary Force”
Try this: How many Times sentences can you find that “break the rules”? Which work best? Why?

4. Sherlock Holmes

Incorporating quotations to support a thesis effectively and correctly is difficult, but journalists deal with this aspect of writing constantly, whether the text is a factual account or an opinion. Consider the indirect quote below from an article on the upcoming election in Iraq. Readers do not know whether these were Suliman’s exact words; however, the statement must accurately convey his thought:
“His most prominent Sunni ally, Sheik Ali Hatam al-Ali Suliman, said the voting bloc he represented in Anbar would never vote directly for Mr. Maliki.”
— “Vote Seen as Pivotal Test for Both Iraq and Maliki”
Try this: You won’t have to read far to find examples in The Times of both direct and indirect quotations. Try conversion practice yourself by changing a direct quote into an indirect quote, following the punctuation approach you see in the Times article. For more on direct quotes, click here.

5. Confusion Central

The best of us sometimes get tangled up in lengthy sentences, sidetracked by the ancillary ideas in subordinate clauses or prepositional phrases.
Take a sticky sentence apart in order to get to its core. For instance, the fundamental information in the sentence below about the actor Jeff Bridges is quite brief: Duane is the subject; set is the verb; the template is the direct object.
“Wounded, a little lost, Duane set the template for a Bridges type who was down on his luck and maybe skimming bottom, at times with a smile that looked far too innocent for an actor who soon made a habit of quietly taking over his films.”
— “The Dude Plumbs His Weary Soul”
Try this: Choose your own sticky Times sentence, then remove (or bracket) prepositional phrases, appositives, verbal phrases, and dependent clauses to uncover the heart of the sentence and therefore its essential meaning. For more on dependent clauses, click here.

For more grammar ideas, lesson plans and exercises, visitGrammarlogues.com.

Grammar Lesson
Directions:  Rewrite the following sentences to correct the dangling participle.

1.  Blown away by the storm, the family could not find the roof to their house.
2. Climbing to the top of the hill, the view was spectacular.
3.  Saddened by the news, a condolence card was sent to Fatima by her coworkers.
4.  Rushing to get to the bank by 6pm, the right tire on Tom's car blew out.
5.  Sleeping with the window open, my throat was sore the next day.
6.  Arguing with the teacher, the test was failed by Carol.
7.  Beaten down by the weather, the farmer could not save his crops.
8.  Painting by the morning light, the masterpiece was completed in record time.
9.  Walking through the hot desert, a new and unusual cave was found by the explorer.
10.Grading the exams, my vision became blurry.





Sunday, February 13, 2011

Boy Wonder

All children can learn!  How amazingly true that tenet of the Molloy dispositions turns out to be.  I witnessed a miracle on Saturday that brought tears to my eyes.  It is something I will never forget, and along with January 30, 1992 the day I birthed my one pound son, it might be the most profound and enlightening experience I have ever lived through.

My friend, Jodi Sh. Doff (Sh. is a whole other story) and I had a date to see an exhibit at the Museum of the City of New York.  It was the rediscovery of the graphite, pencil and ink drawings of Denys Wortman, a mid-20th century cartoonist.  Little did we know that we had stumbled upon something better that changed our goals of the day.  The museum is hosting an exhibit called, "Ain't Nothing Like the Real Thing: The Apollo Theater and American Entertainment."  This exhibit took us on a tour as the museum flyer says, "from rock n' roll to swing and more."  There were cases displaying the dresses of Ella Fitzgerald, the Supremes, Sammy Davis Jr.'s tap shoes, and Jimi Hendrix's sheet music along with videos of past performers, such as the velvet-voiced, Lena Horne and the bawdy, comedienne Redd Foxx.  Still not the miracle, but I'm getting there.  At the end of the tour we were invited to hear a concert featuring the Child Stars of Tomorrow, the winners of Amateur Night at the Apollo.  Now I knew this was gonna be good.

Down into the theatre we descended.  The host, historian Billy Mitchell, otherwise known as Mr. Apollo, told us about the "best of the best", a group of young performers with so much talent nothing could stop the launching of their careers.  One-by-one they entered stage right and danced and played instruments, sang pop, jazz and gospel. The atmosphere quickly became that of a revival tent meeting. American Idol has nothing, let me hear you say nothing, on the talented child performers from the Apollo.   The spirit filled the room, and then the miracle happened.  A 9 year old blind, partially deaf boy wearing an assisted listening device walked out on stage with the help of an older man.  He bowed to the audience. Although his young, palsied body was unsteady, his ear-to-ear smile gave us all our bearings.  He sat at an electronic keyboard and began to play.  He riffed, he wailed, he tickled the ivories and the sweetest sounds I have ever heard floated through the room.  His body swayed to the vibrations and you could see he was enraptured, as was I.  The audience was on their feet, hands in the air, cheering, crying, applauding.

Mr. Apollo told us that he was present when the then 9 year old Stevie Wonder began his career and warned us that we would be equally impressed.  He was right.  He didn't prepare us, however, for our hearts to be filled with love and our eyes filled with tears that this joyous child with all of his disabilities could move us so wholly.  He was given a chance to shine because someone believed, like the first tenet of the Molly dispositions states, that all children can learn.  He has inspired me and makes me feel so complete that I am on the path to becoming a teacher.  I only hope to have the capacity to touch my students enough for them to believe that they can learn no matter what obstacles and challenges they face in life.  Wow, what a day!



Friday, February 11, 2011

Bad Writing


This is an article that a friend of mine wrote and it is a topic I know oh so well.  For me, constructing a sentence, choosing the words, crossing them out and replacing them with other words, is like giving birth.  It feels likes the words are my children, and if anyone messes with them, they are messing with my rightful ownership to that birth. The patience, the pain, the process, they all belong to me.  I don't appreciate anyone trying to change the birthright of my words.  

I used to cry when my editors at CNN would cross out my words with big red markers.  Sometimes they would cross out the entire page and make me go back to that 'moment of conception' stage.  The ego, the arguments, the tears that flowed were powerful, until I realized that once you give birth to children, or words, you must allow them to grow, mature and yes, even change.  It took me years, but now I know that editing, revising and rewriting doesn't mean the words aren't yours, or that you had no part in conceiving them.  It means you can step back, appreciate the process and the pain and when it's time to let them go you can find comfort in knowing you did the best you can.  So far my children are turning out great; my writing, not so bad.

I believe this is the same process ELLs go through and we as teachers need to understand that, accept it and find as many encouraging words for them to incorporate into their lives and their writing.  Please let me know what you think of his article, the video and this posting.  Thanks, Susan


Ta-Nehisi Coates
TA-NEHISI COATES - Ta-Nehisi Coates is a senior editor for The Atlantic, where he writes about culture, politics, and social issues for TheAtlantic.com and the magazine. He is the author of the memoir The Beautiful Struggle.

Bad Writing

The process by which writing goes from bad to good--or even great--totally fascinates me. I think the main reason more people don't write is the sheer terror of confronting yourself on the page. Somewhere there are people who--on their first try--can make great writing. These people do not have bathrooms in their homes, as they are not human.

The rest of us are mere mortals, whom first drafts are, in the main, cringe-inducing. (Someday I'll post the original "sample chapter" that I submitted to publishers for The Beautiful Struggle. It was so dreadful that only house even bid on the book.) The ability to go to war with one's own awfulness requires a special kind of moxie. I believe that many people have the talent to write. But very few have the courage to rewrite. Even fewer have the courage to rewrite fail, and live to do the whole thing again. And even this gets it wrong. It makes it sound like all of this is some sort of choice. 

This is a long way of introducing a documentary about bad writing. I want to see it.





Tuesday, February 8, 2011

So many web sites, so little time

I must admit that I am enamored with the Internet. Well maybe not enamored, infatuated is more like it.  Perhaps infatuated is not quite strong enough. Gaga, crazy, mad, hooked, attracted, bewitched, charmed, enthralled, enraptured, entranced, besotted, that is what I am, all of the above.  The verb enamor means to fascinate or captivate.  Check! The Internet fascinates and captivates both my time and my attention.  The adjective enamored means to be in love.  Check!  I am in love with the Internets ease of use, its versatility, its adaptability, its goldmine of data.  

It speeds up the slow tedious process of research to the speed of light.  One touch of a button and what used to take hours and hours of looking through the stacks at the library is now revealed in seconds.  It allows for creativity.  I can put my artistic endeavors on virtual paper and tweak them until the colors and the shapes are a perfect expression of my creative visions.  I can rock out with the music in my head and record it all in perfect pitch even though I can't read or sing a note. Oh and what I can do with writing.  Edit, revise, rewrite, edit, revise, rewrite.  The first draft, the sloppy copy, the 20th version until I think it is perfect and even though I don't use spellcheck, I spellcheck anyway.  This is the same amazing tool I will exploit to teach ELLs.  Why not?  The Internet is a tool that makes learning easier and fun and with all of its capacity, it can make teaching easier and fun as well. 

Here's a simple word search that I created using words from this post to illustrate just how easy and fun this is.  Try it with your students.


Internet Love
I F A I C G A G A W K J W R D  
L J S E N I F T H M D K A P Z  
F R M E N F X G S E Z B B R O  
Q A A Z W R A M T Z H H J D T  
E Y D N P X A T E G E G M E H  
N Z A M Z E O P U N Y R Y R F  
I A T X H S C X T A Z J I O X  
M R A M E O A H C U T S N M W  
D C K B K A R D R K R E U A Q  
L D E C N A R T N E A E D N Q  
O H Y H L L Y P H D A X D E L  
G X A L A Y W D E M R A H C Y  
J P E N D E H C T I W E B G H  
Q D W I Y K X G D E K O O H Q  
Y M A X A F A T T R A C T E D  
ENAMORED
INFATUATED
GAGA
CRAZY
MAD
HOOKED
ATTRACTED
BEWITCHED
CHARMED
ENTHRALLED
ENRAPTURED
ENTRANCED
BESOTTED
GOLDMINE
DATA


Tuesday, February 1, 2011

The Meaning of Words

"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean - neither more nor less."
"The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many different things."
"The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master-that's all."
                                          Through the Looking Glass (1872) - Lewis Carroll

Humpty Dumpty sure knew what he was talking about.  Now we know he was just an egg and eggs really can not talk, but he does choose his words to mean - "neither more nor less." The truth is that Humpty Dumpty's word choices did not actually take him very far.  For people, on the other hand, choosing appropriate words at the right time can take them very far.   Words equal power.  Words reveal knowledge.  Words can be used for good or evil.  Words can change things.  Words and language are distinctly human.  Words are what separate humans from eggs!

Teaching English as a second language helps to empower English language learners.  It empowers them to express themselves in a way that can improve their lives and the lives of their families.  Learning a new language and using that knowledge helps to secure jobs and success in tasks ranging from the mundane to the miraculous.  Learning new words can inspire people.  Since words express so many different things, mastering as many of them as is possible alters many different lives forever and in my opinion, that is a good thing.


VOCABULARY CORNER - Check it out!







SPELLING CORNER
Quiz on 10 commonly misspelled words
In each of the following pairs, only one is a word; the other is a common misspelling of that word.  See if you can identify the correctly spelled word in each set.

1. (a) absorbtion (b) absorption
The act or process of absorbing something; occupying the full attention or interest.

2. (a) accidentally (b) accidently
Happening unexpectedly or by chance.

3. (a) alterior (b) ulterior
Lying beyond what is evident; deliberately and deceptively concealed.

4. (a) Arctic (b) Artic
Relating to the North Pole or the region near it.

5. (a) asterick (b) asterisk
The character * use as a reference mark in print.

6. (a) basically (b) basicly
At a basic level or in a basic manner.

7. (a) congradulations (b) congratulations
Acknowledging achievement or good fortune.

8. (a) definate (b) definite
Certain, clearly defined, having distinct limits.

9. (a) disasterous (b) disastrous
Terrible, calamitous

10. (a) embarass (b) embarrass
To cause someone to feel ill at ease or self-conscious.

SPELLING ANSWERS
1)b, 2)a, 3)b, 4)a, 5)b, 6)a, 7)b, 8)b, 9)b, 10)b